UnternehmerTUM: Agile Transformation at Scale
2025–2026 (Ongoing)
Why It WorkedAgile transformation fails when it's just training or just coaching. UnternehmerTUM proved that combining structured learning with hands-on support and strategy coaching creates real, sustained change. And recurring bookings prove the value sticks.
The Real OutcomeRecurring engagements across multiple cohorts in 2025–2026. Organizations that came for a workshop stayed for the transformation: the blended Talk+Decide model proved itself in practice.
The Challenge
UnternehmerTUM, Munich’s innovation hub, needed to help organizations transform their project and product development practices to be genuinely agile, not just in theory, but in practice.
The problem: Many organizations do agile training, but teams don’t actually adopt it. Others do coaching, but without clear frameworks. UnternehmerTUM needed a blended approach that combined structured learning with hands-on practice and ongoing support.
What We Did
We designed and delivered a multi-modal training & coaching program:
Core Offerings:
- "Agile Praktiken für Projekte & Produktentwicklung": Agile practices for projects and product dev
- "Inhouse Training Agiles - Hybrides PM": In-house agile hybrid project management training
- "Interaktiver Praxis-Workshop zur Projektarbeit": Interactive practice workshop on project work
The Blended Model:
- Structured workshops: clear frameworks, hands-on exercises, real scenarios
- In-house customization: tailored to each organization's specific context
- Ongoing coaching: support teams through the actual transformation journey
- Scalable delivery: multiple cohorts across 2025–2026
Results
- Recurring bookings: clients requested multiple offerings across 2025–2026
- Blended adoption: Talk + Decide working together (training + strategy coaching)
- Scalable model: training can grow to multiple cohorts without losing quality
- Trusted partner: continuation into next year proves sustained value
- Forward-thinking clients: innovation hub adoption signals credibility